"Developed a system to track tanker’s movements from the point of origin to destination."

I would like to know how this impacted the company. Did it increase tanker availability or reduce costs? Are there metrics that speak to the impact?

I would take second look at all of your bullets and ask yourself, "Does this communicate an accomplishment or a responsibility? Am I telling the reader how this achievement positively effected the company?"

I will attach a link to my blog, which has quite a few good resume writing tips. I think you might find it helpful.

Best of luck in the job search!
References :
http://www.tandemresumes.com/Resumes/Blog/Blog.html

To be honest your CV sounds like you have put loads of stuff in but none of it is backed up so they have no idea how relevant you are to their role. You should tailor your CV to the role, if the is a finance job them give them a CV which outlines what skills and experience you have in finance. if it is a project management role then tone down the finance and beef up the project management.

Dump the software section, none of those are particularly specialised and you need the space to expand on yourself and your experience. If you really think software is relevant for the role then incorporate it into your experience section i.e. Developed and maintained inventory management system for customers using Microsoft Access
References :

remove "Prepared and submitted import/export documentation"

remove "Provided customers with hassle free travel experience by focusing on their needs."

overall, it seems too busy. and you may want to consider changing the carrerr summary to a missions statement. tell them what you want to do, not what you already did. thats what the history part is for.
References :

they should all become nonprofits and support their activities through charitable donations. if they can’t, that just means there’s no public demand to have that service exist. not to mention NPOs are far more accountable for their expenditures than the government is, which would mean less money is wasted on bureaucracy.

people say "Where’s your compassion?" but what’s happening is the government, through taxation, is forcing me to make charitable donations. we should be able to give our hard-earned money to whatever charity we like. yes, America in general still does that, but if we were taxed at a lesser rate because of the elimination of these programs, then we’d have more money to give to charities of our choice.
References :

- Freddy Mac & Fannie Mae - failure
- Administration on Aging (AoA) - ridiculous
- Healthy Marriage Initiative (HMI) - lmao
- Bureau of Western Hemisphere Affairs - not necessary
- Office of Management Policy - not necessary
- Office of Protocol - not necessary
- Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board - stupid
- African Development Foundation - we should worry about our own domestic problems first before worrying about the domestic problems in various countries on another continent.
- National Ice Center (NIC) - not necessary
- The C.I.A. - their b/s lies got us into Iraq. How much did the oil corporations pay them to produce those "intelligence" reports of "weapons of mass destruction" in Iraq? Hmm. Can’t help but wonder.

The rest I agree with. The MOST important programs there that we should keep and fund better than we are now are the Department of Education, the Department of Energy, Social Security, Job Corps and anything that is associated with health care, education or cultural groups (especially Native Americans, I mean come on, it’s the least we can do after stealing their land). All the foreign affairs programs that are currently independent should be grouped together under the State Department.

A lot of those programs truly ARE necessary. Many aren’t, but are still useful.
References :